Productive multivocality in the analysis of collaborative learning

Technological affordances for productive multivocality in analysis

Productive multivocality in CSCL has been the focus of a series of workshops involving the comparison and contrasting of multiple analyses of the same datasets, with the goal of learning how different epistemologies and analysis methods of collaborative learning can complement each other and allow a more complete understanding to emerge. A prerequisite to such work is the technological ability ...

Leveraging Researcher Multivocality for Insights on Collaborative Learning Workshop # 8 White Paper

This workshop targets researchers in the Learning Sciences, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) and Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) communities who are interested in how human interaction leads to learning. Such researchers come from many different disciplines (psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, computer science, didactics, etc.) and thus employ diverse methods in pursu...

Leveraging Researcher Multivocality for Insights on Collaborative Learning

Designing collaborative learning model in online learning environments

Introduction: Most online learning environments are challenging for the design of collaborative learning activities to achieve high-level learning skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to design and validate a model for collaborative learning in online learning environments. Methods: The research method used in this study was a mixed method, including qualitative content analysis and...

Collaborative Writing Practice through Online Learning: Insights from Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions

This study investigates the benefits of e-collaborative and collaborative writing tasks on the perception of Iranian EFL learners in a process-oriented approach. The study involved 74 intermediate Iranian EFL students at Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch. They were divided into three groups by random assignment as two experimental groups and one control group. The experimental groups were...